ID the Future Podcasting on Intelligent Design and Evolution

IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail

Casey Luskin Discusses Homo Naledi on The God Solution

On this episode of ID the Future, Nate Herbst of The God Solution interviews Casey Luskin on the recent Homo naledi find. Luskin discusses claims of where Homo naledi fits into the fossil record and whether or not it buried its dead, ultimately answering the question, “Is Homo naledi a human ancestor?”

Read More ›
IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail

The God Solution – Pt 4

On this fourth episode of ID the Future, Nate Herbst of The God Solution and Casey Luskin discuss intelligent design research at the Biologic Institute. Luskin also notes that professors lack academic freedom to discuss intelligent design at public institutions, highlighting the case of a physics professor from Ball State University.

Read More ›
IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail

The God Solution – Pt 3

On this third episode of ID the Future, Nate Herbst of The God Solution and Casey Luskin discuss the commitment of intelligent design to “follow the evidence wherever it leads.” While evolutionists have pointed to so-called junk DNA as evidence against intelligent design, Luskin shares about recent findings that it plays critical roles in the cell.

Read More ›
IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail

The God Solution – Pt 2

On this second episode of ID the Future, Nate Herbst of The God Solution and Casey Luskin discuss the question, “Why do people conflate intelligent design with creationism?” Luskin explains the positive argument for intelligent design from DNA and clarifies key distinctions between the religious view of creationism and the scientific theory of intelligent design.

Read More ›
IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail

The God Solution – Pt 1

On this first episode of ID the Future, Nate Herbst of The God Solution and Casey Luskin discuss their experiences as students, interacting with professors over the origins of life controversy. Luskin describes how involvement in a student club first awakened his interest in the intelligent design debate.

Read More ›