IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail
ID the Future Intelligent Design, Evolution, and Science Podcast
Episodes
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Darwin Doubter: An Interview with Dr. Lyle Jensen, Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (Part Five)

Episode
152
Guest
ID the Future
Duration
00:13:20
Download
Audio File (12.2 mb)
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

This is the fifth installment in a six-part interview with Dr. Lyle Jensen. Today on ID The Future, Jensen explains his doubts about Darwinian evolution, citing everything from X-ray crystallography and fossils to blood clots and academic brainwashing. He also enunciates his fears that commitment to Darwinian dogma is impeding advances in scientific discovery.

The quote Dr. Jensen refers to during this podcast is taken from Richard Lewontin’s book review of The Demon-Haunted World: Science As a Candle in the Dark, by Carl Sagan. The book review is available from the New York Review of Books.

About Dr. Lyle Jensen

Dr. Jensen is a biochemist and pioneer in the field of x-ray crystallography. The American Crystallographic Association recognized Jensen’s work in 1983 with the Fankuchen Memorial Award in X-Ray Crystallography, and again honored him in 2000 with the Martin J. Buerger Award. Dr. Jensen is a long-time scientific skeptic of Neo-Darwinian theory, and has signed the Scientific Dissent from Darwinism. Jensen is Professor (Emeritus) with the Department of Biological Structure and Department of Biochemistry at the University of Washington, and is a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science and an elected member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences .

ID the Future

The ID The Future (IDTF) podcast explores the issues central to evolution and intelligent design. In short, pointed episodes, the podcast provides the most current news and views on evolution and ID. IDTF delivers interviews with key scientists and scholars developing the theory of ID, as well as insightful commentary from Discovery Institute senior fellows and staff on the scientific, educational, and legal aspects of the debate.
Tags