ID the Future Intelligent Design, Evolution, and Science Podcast
Topic

Casey Luskin

London, England - December 4, 2019: Statue of Charles Robert Darwin was an English naturalist and biologist in Natural History Museum. London, United Kingdom.
Statue of Charles Darwin. Licensed via Adobe Stock, wittayayut - stock.adobe.com
Type
post
Author
Steve Fuller
Date
January 7, 2026
Tagged
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

20 Years After Dover: Steve Fuller on Science, Censorship, and the “Church of Darwin”

Steve Fuller
January 7, 2026
Uncategorized
2
In this ID The Future, host Casey Luskin concludes a two-part conversation with University of Warwick professor and author Steve Fuller reflecting on the 20th anniversary of the Kitzmiller v. Dover trial, a case that examined the constitutionality of teaching intelligent design in public schools. Fuller discusses his experience serving as an expert witness for the defense. He defends his support of a policy that merely informed students of alternative theories to Darwinian evolution. He explains why high school is an ideal time to encourage an open mind toward science. Then he pivots to discuss the deeper issue of institutional censorship in science and how establishment science functions as a religion. He characterizes intelligent design as "anti-establishment" and suggests there's hope for a more pluralistic approach to science in the near future. This is Part 2 of a two-part interview. Read More ›
Screenshot-2026-01-05-at-12726PM
Type
post
Author
Steve Fuller
Date
January 5, 2026
Tagged
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Professor Steve Fuller on the Rich Tradition of Intelligent Design

Steve Fuller
January 5, 2026
Uncategorized
2
On this episode of ID the Future, host Casey Luskin begins a two-part conversation with University of Warwick professor Steve Fuller to reflect on the historical and philosophical foundations of intelligent design (ID) and the 20th anniversary of the Kitzmiller v. Dover trial. Fuller, an expert witness in the Dover trial and a scholar in the history and philosophy of science, challenges the popular "conflict thesis" that suggests that science and religion are perpetually at war. Instead, he describes a different historical understanding where modern science originated from a theological foundation, noting pioneers like Newton and Galileo, who viewed the universe as an intelligible machine designed by a divine mind. This tradition suggests that the very project of science was launched by the belief that human minds, created in the image and likeness of God, are capable of uncovering the logical laws governing reality. The conversation delves into why intelligent design should be viewed as a rich, interdisciplinary research tradition rather than a modern invention. Fuller explores the concept of biomimicry as a form of reverse engineering nature to uncover the hidden engineering elements within organisms. While Luskin notes that ID can be approached through purely scientific observations of intelligent agency, Fuller argues that theology remains a vital component because it explains why the designer uses "code" or the "logos"—be it in DNA or mathematical laws—as a creative medium. This insightful first part of a two-part series highlights how ID integrates biology, engineering, and information science to offer a comprehensive explanation for the complexity of the natural world. Read More ›
rough-colored-ocean-wave-falling-down-at-sunset-time-stockpa-167197431-stockpack-adobestock
rough colored ocean wave falling down at sunset time
Image Credit: willyam - Adobe Stock
Type
post
Author
Casey Luskin
Date
December 24, 2025
Tagged
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Casey Luskin on the Rising Tide of Intelligent Design Research

Casey Luskin
December 24, 2025
Uncategorized
3
Any scientific theory for the origin of life and the universe is only as strong as its research program. For intelligent design, this is good news. On today's ID The Future, Dr. Casey Luskin describes the current growth and scientific maturity of the Intelligent Design (ID) movement. Luskin describes the progress of ID across three main areas: successful scientific predictions, the unresolved failures of Neo-Darwinism to account for life, and the growth of the ID community as well as scientists outside ID who are looking for alternatives to modern evolutionary proposals. Dr. Luskin compares the growth of the ID research program to a snowball; it started small and faced early setbacks, but it is now rapidly picking up size, speed, and scientific weight as it rolls forward. Read More ›
classical-columns-on-government-building-with-colorful-sky-s-496190394-stockpack-adobestock
Classical columns on government building with colorful sky
Image Credit: littleny - Adobe Stock
Type
post
Author
Casey Luskin
Date
December 17, 2025
Tagged
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Casey Luskin: How the ID Movement Has Flourished Since the Dover Trial

Casey Luskin
December 17, 2025
Uncategorized
3
Was the modern intelligent design (ID) movement "over after Dover," as many ID critics hoped it would be? Quite the opposite. In the last two decades ID has flourished as a scientific research program and continues to gain momentum in both academia and the public square. On today's ID The Future, host Andrew McDiarmid concludes his conversation with geologist, legal scholar, and Dover trial expert Dr. Casey Luskin. In this segment, marking the 20th anniversary of the Kitzmiller vs. Dover trial of 2005, the pair examine the outcome of the Dover trial, in which a judge ruled that intelligent design was a religious viewpoint, not science, and therefore unconstitutional to teach in public schools. Luskin explains why the Dover ruling was highly flawed and unreliable and how it misrepresented the definition of science and the arguments of ID proponents. Luskin also reveals how the ID movement has flourished in the twenty years since Dover. This is Part 2 of a two-part conversation. Read More ›
judge-with-gavel-sitting-at-wooden-table-closeup-stockpack-a-685934129-stockpack-adobestock
Judge with gavel sitting at wooden table, closeup
Image Credit: New Africa - Adobe Stock
Type
post
Author
Casey Luskin
Date
December 15, 2025
Tagged
, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Casey Luskin: ID Over After Dover? Not Even Close

Casey Luskin
December 15, 2025
Uncategorized
3
Over After Dover. That was the hopeful mantra of many critics of intelligent design (ID) after the Kitzmiller vs. Dover trial in 2005. They were hoping a federal judge could issue a decree from on high that would stop the ID movement cold in its tracks and neo-Darwinism could go back to being unquestioned, unchallenged orthodoxy. But was it over after Dover? Not even close. On this ID The Future, host Andrew McDiarmid marks the 20th anniversary of the Dover trial by beginning a two-part conversation with geologist, legal scholar, and Dover trial expert Dr. Casey Luskin. Luskin takes us back to 2005 to give us his unique perspective on the events that led to the Dover trial, his own personal experiences of the case, and the position the Discovery Institute's Center for Science & Culture held on the issues at stake. This is Part 1 of a two-part conversation. Read More ›
Butterfly-Blueprint
Type
post
Author
Casey Luskin
Date
December 10, 2025
Tagged
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

When Engineering Meets Biology: More From Our Scientist Roundtable

Casey Luskin
December 10, 2025
Uncategorized
3

A Quick Message From Host Andrew McDiarmid: Hey thanks for joining me! Did you know that although ID The Future is free content, it’s not free to produce? If you’re enjoying the interviews, commentaries, and readings you hear on the podcast, would you consider partnering with me to create more new content next year? Support the CSC today to help me generate another amazing lineup of interviews with ID scientists and scholars. Thanks for your support! When biologists use principles of engineering to study living systems, they can gain a richer, deeper understanding of how and why life works. But most biologists are trained to view design as the product of a blind, purposeless, gradual evolutionary process. Today on ID Read More ›

molecule-of-mrna-3d-illustration-stockpack-adobe-stock-533172330-stockpack-adobestock
Molecule of mRNA, 3D illustration
Image Credit: Dr_Microbe - Adobe Stock
Type
post
Author
Casey Luskin
Date
November 17, 2025
Tagged
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Did God Use Evolution to Produce Life? Why Theistic Evolution Fails

Casey Luskin
November 17, 2025
Uncategorized
2
Some people attempt to reconcile belief in God with the standard evolutionary account of life's origins by combining the two. Theistic evolution is the view that God used evolutionary mechanisms to create life. But does this view stand up to scrutiny? Today, Dr. Casey Luskin critiques this perspective in the first half of a conversation that originally aired on the Truthful Hope podcast. The conversation kicks off with some clarity over terms, including what is meant by “evolution.” The theistic evolution perspective, also sometimes called evolutionary creation, accepts the standard scientific evolutionary account—the same view held by atheists—and simply adds the theological claim, "but this is how God did it". Critically, these proponents reject the idea that design can be empirically or scientifically detected in nature. As Luskin highlights, the central scientific problem with theistic evolution is that it inherits all the numerous scientific problems associated with the standard evolutionary account. This first half of the conversation rounds out with examples of those problems, specifically from the issue of the origin of life. This is Part 1 of a two-part conversation. Read More ›
strong-and-brave-firefighter-going-up-the-stairs-in-burning-164563720-stockpack-adobestock
Strong and brave Firefighter Going Up The Stairs in Burning Building. Stairs Burn With Open Flames.
Image Credit: Gorodenkoff - Adobe Stock
Type
post
Author
Casey Luskin
Date
September 17, 2025
Tagged
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Why Evolutionary Psychology Can’t Explain Heroism

Casey Luskin
September 17, 2025
Uncategorized
2
If evolutionary psychology explains every complex human behavior as well as its opposite, does it really explain anything? Today, host Andrew McDiarmid concludes his conversation with geologist and attorney Dr. Casey Luskin about which scientific theory of origins best explains human altruism, cooperation, and morality. McDiarmid recently engaged in some lively discussion under his recent article exploring scientific worldview in the Marvel universe. Specifically, some readers claimed evolution can explain human kindness, heroism, and teamwork. So McDiarmid turned to Luskin, who has spent time researching human origins as well as attempts to explain the origin of human behaviors. Here in Part 2, the pair zoom into altruism to see if evolution can adequately explain it. This is Part 2 of a two-part conversation. Read More ›
help-concept-hands-reaching-out-to-help-each-other-in-dark-t-309576547-stockpack-adobestock
Help Concept hands reaching out to help each other in dark tone.
Image Credit: bignai - Adobe Stock
Type
post
Author
Casey Luskin
Date
September 15, 2025
Tagged
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Which Origins Theory Better Explains Altruism and Morality?

Casey Luskin
September 15, 2025
Uncategorized
2
Do evolutionary models adequately account for the reality of human altruism, moral conviction, and cooperation? Does intelligent design offer a better explanation? On this ID The Future, host Andrew McDiarmid begins discussing these questions and more with geologist and attorney Casey Luskin. McDiarmid's recent article exploring scientific worldview in the Marvel universe generated some lively back-and-forth in the comments section, particularly about whether evolutionary processes could account for humans looking out for other humans. Luskin tackles the question head-on, putting it in the larger context of evolutionary psychology's penchant for explaining every possible human behavior through the lens of a Darwinian past. This is Part 1 of a two-part conversation. Look for Part 2 in a separate episode. Read More ›
Bangkok, Thailand - November 13 2020: Australopithecus at Rama9 museum, Australopithecus afarensis is an extinct species of an early human
Licensed from Adobe Stock, 476867860. Used with permission for editorial use only.
Type
post
Author
Casey Luskin
Date
September 3, 2025
Tagged
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

How to Respond to Common Criticisms of Intelligent Design

Casey Luskin
September 3, 2025
Uncategorized
3
God of the gaps. Lucy as human ancestor. Co-option to explain away irreducible complexity. Perhaps you've heard some of the most common objections to intelligent design, but do you know how to adequately respond to them? On today's ID The Future, geologist and lawyer Casey Luskin explains how to refute these and other objections to intelligent design as he concludes a conversation with host Jacob Vasquez that originally aired on the Truthful Hope podcast. This is Part 2 of a two-part conversation. Read More ›
Discovery Institute