venus-flytrap-dionaea-muscipula-with-trapped-fly-stockpack-adobe-stock.jpg
ID the Future Intelligent Design, Evolution, and Science Podcast
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

The Venus Flytrap Takes a Bite Out of Darwinism

Episode
1712
With
Andrew McDiarmid
Guest
Marcos Eberlin
Duration
00:10:29
Download
Audio File (7.2 mb)
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

On this ID the Future from the vault, Andrew McDiarmid reads from Marcos Eberlin’s fascinating book Foresight: How the Chemistry of Life Reveals Planning and Purpose. In this excerpt, the distinguished Brazilian scientist highlights the challenge the Venus flytrap poses for evolutionary theory. Dr. Eberlin describes the problem: The Venus flytrap, like all carnivorous plants, has no use for its insect-trapping function unless it also has an insect-digesting function. And vice versa. But the evolutionary mechanism of natural selection selects for current function, not potential future function. Unlike a designing intelligence, natural selection can’t look into the future and plan in that way. So for natural selection to have selected these twin systems, they would somehow have had to evolve together. But could they really evolve together? How, when there would be no functional advantage along much of the evolutionary pathway to the sophisticated finished systems? Finally, how did this “evolutionary miracle” also happen in four other carnivorous plant genera, supposed cases of “convergent evolution”? (See a video of the Venus flytrap in action here, as mentioned in the podcast.)