blue-balloon-man-hold-needle-directed-to-air-balloon-concept-of-risk-copy-space-stockpack-adobe-stock
Blue balloon. Man hold needle directed to air balloon. Concept of risk. Copy space.
Image licensed via Adobe Stock
ID the Future Intelligent Design, Evolution, and Science Podcast
Episodes
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Puncturing the Science-Faith Warfare Myth

Episode
1726
With
Casey Luskin
Guest
Michael Newton Keas
Duration
00:32:54
Download
Audio File (17.3 mb)
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

On today’s ID the Future, join host and geologist Casey Luskin and historian of science Michael Keas for a lively conversation puncturing a series of anti-Christian myths about the history of science, including the Dark Ages myth, the flat-earth myth, the myth that the discovery of how big the universe is rendered humanity insignificant, and the simplistic revisionist history of Galileo and the Inquisition. What about the claim in the recent Cosmos TV series that in abandoning his traditional Jewish faith, seventeenth-century philosopher Baruch Spinoza was able to provide an improved framework for doing science? As Keas argues, the truth is just the opposite. Spinoza, he says, abandoned a key tenet of Judeo-Christian theology that had proven vital to the birth of science.

The conversation is occasioned by Keas’s essay in the newly released Science and Faith in Dialogue, available for free download.

Michael Newton Keas

Senior Fellow, Center for Science and Culture
After earning a Ph.D. in the history of science from the University of Oklahoma, Mike Keas won research grants from such organizations as the National Science Foundation and the American Council of Learned Societies. He experienced some of the last historic moments behind the Berlin Wall as a Fulbright scholar in East Germany. Keas serves as lecturer in the history and philosophy of science at Biola University and on the board of directors of Ratio Christi, an alliance of apologetics clubs on college campuses. He has written numerous articles, including “Systematizing the Theoretical Virtues” in the top-tier philosophy journal Synthese. This essay analyzes twelve traits of reputable theories, and has generated dialogue across many fields. With a quarter-century of experience teaching science and its history to college students, Keas is qualified to lay out the facts to show how far the conventional wisdom about science and religion departs from reality. He has done so in the ISI book Unbelievable: 7 Myths about the History and Future of Science and Religion.