IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail
audio button
ID the Future Podcasting on Intelligent Design and Evolution
Episodes

Intelligent Design’s Implications Don’t Discredit Its Scientific Merit: Opposing Views, Part 3

Guests
Casey Luskin
Duration
00:13:14
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Print
arroba Email

On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin explains why any philosophical implications of intelligent design, or any religious motives, beliefs, and affiliations of ID proponents, do not disqualify ID from having scientific merit.

This podcast is taken from a series of articles published at OpposingViews.com and can be read here.

Casey Luskin

Casey Luskin is an attorney with graduate degrees in science and law, giving him expertise in both the scientific and legal dimensions of the debate over evolution. He earned his B.S. and M.S. in Earth Sciences from the University of California, San Diego, where he studied evolution extensively at both the graduate and undergraduate levels. His law degree is from the University of San Diego, where he focused his studies on First Amendment law, education law, and environmental law. He conducted geological research at Scripps Institution for Oceanography (1997-2002).
Tags