ID the Future Intelligent Design, Evolution, and Science Podcast
Topic

William Dembski

IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail

William Dembski on the Gilmore & Glahn Show, pt. 2

On this episode of ID the Future, hear the second segment of William Dembski’s recent appearance on the Gilmore and Glahn radio show. Dembski and Gilmore discuss whether or not intelligent design is science, and what the theory’s current status is among scientists.

Read More ›
IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail

William Dembski on the Gilmore & Glahn Show, pt. 1

On this episode of ID the Future, William Dembski is on the Gilmore & Glahn show, where he talks with John Gilmore about the theory of, and science behind, his latest book, Being as Communion. Dembski also discusses what he views as the greatest weakness of Darwinian evolution: the information problem.

IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail

Dr. Bill Dembski: Being As Communion, pt. 2

On this episode of ID the Future hear more of John West’s interview with Dr. Bill Dembski as they discuss Dr. Dembski’s latest book Being as Communion: A Metaphysics of Information. Listen in as Dr. Dembski explains 3 central points at the heart of his book: the Tang problem, the problem of no, and transposition.

Read More ›
A buffalo (bison) stands on a grassy hill.jpg
A buffalo (bison) stands on a grassy hill and looks back at you.  Behind it lies a valley full of fir trees and the rising sun. 3D Rendering

Dr. Bill Dembski: Being As Communion

On this episode of ID the Future, CSC Associate Director John West sits down with Mathematician and Philosopher Dr. Bill Dembski to discuss his new book Being as Communion: A Metaphysics of Information. Dr. Dembski describes his book as “trying … to make sense of the world of matter is not the most fundamental thing, but information is.” Tune in to this fascinating discussion about our understanding of information, and how it can transform our view of the world. Purchase Being as Communion at Amazon.

IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail

Dr. William Dembski: Inspired by Richard Dawkins

On this episode of ID the Future listen as Dr. William Dembski reflects on the origins of his thinking on intelligent design, acknowledging the influence of Richard Dawkins, who gave him the link between specification and complexity as a marker for ID.

Read More ›
IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail

Darwin as the Pinball Wizard: Talking Probability with Robert Marks

On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin interviews Dr. Robert J. Marks, who recently published two papers with William Dembski and another paper with Dr. Dembski and graduate student Winston Ewert. This is Dr. Marks’ first IDTF interview since Baylor University shut down his pro-ID Evolutionary Informatics Lab, now available at a third-party website, EvoInfo.org.

Read More ›
IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail

Meyer and Dembski Breakthroughs Top ID Science Stories for 2009

On this episode of ID the Future Casey Luskin interviews Dennis Wagner, executive director of the Access Research Network discussing ARN’s top 5 Darwin and Design science stories for 2009. Listen in to learn how the work of Stephen Meyer and William Dembski topped the list of ID science accomplishments for 2009.

Read More ›
IDTF-thumbnail
IDTF-thumbnail

How Information Theory Is Taking Intelligent Design Mainstream: An Interview With Dr. William Dembski

This episode of ID the Future continues Casey Luskin’s interviews Dr. William Dembski on his new peer-reviewed paper, “Conservation of Information in Search: Measuring the Cost of Success,” published in IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics A, Systems & Humans.

Read More ›
reconciling account
Account

Information and Clear Accounting in Evolution: An Interview With Dr. William Dembski

On this episode of ID the Future Casey Luskin interviews Dr. William Dembski on his new peer-reviewed paper, “Conservation of Information in Search: Measuring the Cost of Success,” published in IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics A, Systems & Humans. Listen in as Dr. Dembski shares how his research provides accounting practices for checking out where the information in evolutionary processes is being inserted and expressed, thus holding evolutionists accountable to the fact that information is coming from an outside source. For more information, read the paper at EvoInfo.org.