Type post
Date January 8, 2009
Tagged , __edited , philosophical implications
Intelligent Design’s Implications Don’t Discredit Its Scientific Merit: Opposing Views, Part 3
Casey Luskin
January 8, 2009
Uncategorized
Episode 288
Guest(s) Casey Luskin
Duration 00:13:14 Download Audio File (9.1 mb)
Share
Facebook
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email
On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin explains why any philosophical implications of intelligent design, or any religious motives, beliefs, and affiliations of ID proponents, do not disqualify ID from having scientific merit.
This podcast is taken from a series of articles published at OpposingViews.com and can be read here .
Photo by Nathan Jacobson, © Discovery Institute (CC BY-SA 4.0) Associate Director and Senior Fellow , Center for Science and CultureCasey Luskin is a geologist and an attorney with graduate degrees in science and law, giving him expertise in both the scientific and legal dimensions of the debate over evolution. He earned his PhD in Geology from the University of Johannesburg, and BS and MS degrees in Earth Sciences from the University of California, San Diego, where he studied evolution extensively at both the graduate and undergraduate levels. His law degree is from the University of San Diego, where he focused his studies on First Amendment law, education law, and environmental law.
