Tag: Michael Polanyi

^{Type
post

Author
Stephen C. Meyer

Date
September 20, 2021

Categorized
Faith and Science

Tagged
Alexander Vilenkin, Atheism, Big Bang, Boltzmann brain problem, boundary constraints, cosmic beginning, Deepak Chopra, epistemological chaos, fine tuning, Hartle-Hawking Model, Intelligent Design, John Leslie, John Searle, Lawrence Krauss, laws of physics, Michael Polanyi, Michael Shermer, mind-body dualism, monism, nothingness, panpsychism, Pantheism, physicalism, prime reality, pure mathematics, quantum cosmology, rationality, Return of the God Hypothesis, Richard Dawkins, Robert Lawrence Kuhn, Schrödinger equation, singularity, Stephen C. Meyer, The Mystery of Existence, Theism, universal wave function, Universe from Nothing, Wheeler-DeWitt equation, Who Designed the Designer}

Pt. 4: Stephen Meyer and Skeptic Michael Shermer

_{Stephen C. Meyer

September 20, 2021

Faith and Science}

This ID the Future wraps up a lively four-part series between religious skeptic Michael Shermer and Return of the God Hypothesis author and philosopher of science Stephen Meyer. Here Meyer underscores the fact that every worldview must posit something as the prime reality, and he argues that positing mind (rather than matter) as the prime reality solves far more problems in science, and not just in origins science. What about the idea of a multiverse to explain the fine tuning of the laws and constants of physics? Meyer concedes that this is a solution of sorts, but it comes at a tremendous cost, which he explains. That’s just a taste of where Meyer and Shermer go in this final segment. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Stephen C. Meyer

Date
September 17, 2021

Categorized
Faith and Science

Tagged
alien life, Atheism, Big Bang, deism, extra-terrestrial life, fine tuning, Francis Crick, front-loaded, Intelligent Design, Michael Polanyi, Michael Shermer, Natural Theology, origin of life, origin of the universe, panspermia, Richard Dawkins, Sean Carroll, Shermer’s Last Law, skepticism, Stephen C. Meyer, The Big Picture, Theism, theology of nature}

Pt. 3: Stephen Meyer and Skeptic Michael Shermer

_{Stephen C. Meyer

September 17, 2021

Faith and Science}

On this ID the Future, Return of the God Hypothesis author Stephen Meyer and skeptic Michael Shermer address the question of how a divine immaterial being could act in the material world to design and fashion things such as the first life. Meyer argues that while we don’t know precisely how an immaterial mind would do this or did do this, we have good evidence that minds can and do affect matter, as for instance in the evidence that our minds can affect our brains and, by extension, our bodies. Meyer and Shermer also discuss the idea of front-loaded intelligent design—that is, where God loaded into the moment of the Big Bang everything necessary for the emergence of stars, planets, Earth, Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Aeschliman

Date
October 16, 2019

Tagged
__edited, B. F. Skinner, Blaise Pascal, C.S. Lewis, Charles Dickens, Dante Alighieri, Enlightenment rationalism, epiphenomenalism, François Rabelais, Fyodor Dostoyevsky, G.K. Chesterton, Gulliver’s Travels, John Henry Newman, Jonathan Swift, Michael Polanyi, physicalism, Pierre Duhem, Samuel Johnson, Scientism, Stanley L. Jaki, Thomas Carlyle, William Shakespeare}

Aeschliman on Three Great Authors Critiquing Scientism

_{Michael Aeschliman

October 16, 2019}

On this episode of ID the Future, Andrew McDiarmid concludes his two-part conversations with Michael Aeschliman, author of the newly revised and expanded The Restoration of Man: C. S. Lewis and the Continuing Case Against Scientism. Here Aeschliman places Lewis among a strong line of thinkers critiquing scientism, including the philosopher/mathematician Blaise Pascal, who showed that scientific knowledge on its own could never be sufficient for being fully human; the theologian and physicist Stanley L. Jaki, who brilliantly integrated science and theology; and the great English author Jonathan Swift, whose satirical work skewered the illusions of scientific reductionism.