ID the Future Intelligent Design, Evolution, and Science Podcast
Topic

Scopes Monkey Trial

Abstract luminous DNA molecule, neon helix on purple background. Medical science, genetic, biotechnology, chemistry, biology.
Abstract luminous DNA molecule, neon helix on purple background. Medical science, genetic, biotechnology, chemistry, biology. Vector poster. Licensed via Adobe Stock.

How Intelligent Design Has Flourished In Spite of the Scopes Effect

The Scopes "Monkey" trial of 1925 has cast a long shadow over the evolution debate in the last century, thanks in large part to the Hollywood film Inherit the Wind, which caricatured the trial and promoted stereotypes that still persist today. On this ID The Future, host Andrew McDiarmid continues a conversation with Dr. Casey Luskin about the long history of the Scopes effect in science and how intelligent design has managed to flourish in spite of it. This is Part 2 of a two-part conversation. Read More ›
DISCO_210401_TakingLeaveOfDarwinCover_v3
Neil Thomas Taking Leave of Darwin cover image

Neil Thomas Talks Darwin, Aquinas, OOL and … Young Frankenstein

On this ID the Future, Taking Leave of Darwin author Neil Thomas continues a lively conversation with radio host Hank Hanegraaff. In this second in a three-part series, the two touch on the fossil record’s challenge to Darwinism, Gould and Eldredge’s rescue attempt, the question of whether Darwin’s best known contemporary defender is dishonest or merely self-deluded, the wishful thinking surrounding origin-of-life studies, the failed attempts to reduce the mind to mere brain chemistry, and the morally repugnant pro-eugenics ideas rooted in Darwinism and touted in the textbook at the heart of the famous Scopes Monkey Trial. The conversation is posted here by permission of Hank Hanegraaff. Get Neil Thomas’s book here.

Ant action standing.jpg
Ant action standing.Ant bridge unity team carry food Concept team work together
Image Credit: frank29052515 - Adobe Stock

Scott Turner on Purpose in Nature, Part 1

Turner argues that modern Darwinism has reached a scientific dead end, unable to tell us what life is, treating many of its features — including purpose and desire — virtually as illusions. Read More ›