ID the Future Intelligent Design, Evolution, and Science Podcast
Topic

Evolution

judge-with-gavel-sitting-at-wooden-table-closeup-stockpack-a-685934129-stockpack-adobestock
Judge with gavel sitting at wooden table, closeup
Image Credit: New Africa - Adobe Stock
Type
post
Author
Casey Luskin
Date
December 15, 2025
Tagged
, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Casey Luskin: ID Over After Dover? Not Even Close

Casey Luskin
December 15, 2025
Uncategorized
3
Over After Dover. That was the hopeful mantra of many critics of intelligent design (ID) after the Kitzmiller vs. Dover trial in 2005. They were hoping a federal judge could issue a decree from on high that would stop the ID movement cold in its tracks and neo-Darwinism could go back to being unquestioned, unchallenged orthodoxy. But was it over after Dover? Not even close. On this ID The Future, host Andrew McDiarmid marks the 20th anniversary of the Dover trial by beginning a two-part conversation with geologist, legal scholar, and Dover trial expert Dr. Casey Luskin. Luskin takes us back to 2005 to give us his unique perspective on the events that led to the Dover trial, his own personal experiences of the case, and the position the Discovery Institute's Center for Science & Culture held on the issues at stake. This is Part 1 of a two-part conversation. Read More ›
Butterfly-Blueprint
Type
post
Author
Casey Luskin
Date
December 10, 2025
Tagged
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

When Engineering Meets Biology: More From Our Scientist Roundtable

Casey Luskin
December 10, 2025
Uncategorized
3

A Quick Message From Host Andrew McDiarmid: Hey thanks for joining me! Did you know that although ID The Future is free content, it’s not free to produce? If you’re enjoying the interviews, commentaries, and readings you hear on the podcast, would you consider partnering with me to create more new content next year? Support the CSC today to help me generate another amazing lineup of interviews with ID scientists and scholars. Thanks for your support! When biologists use principles of engineering to study living systems, they can gain a richer, deeper understanding of how and why life works. But most biologists are trained to view design as the product of a blind, purposeless, gradual evolutionary process. Today on ID Read More ›

Screenshot-2025-12-08-at-35103PM
Type
post
Author
Casey Luskin
Date
December 8, 2025
Tagged
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Scientist Roundtable: Examples of Intelligent Design in the Human Body

Casey Luskin
December 8, 2025
Uncategorized
3
It's easy to be blown away by the examples of engineering prowess in the human body. But it can be challenging to turn that evidence into a robust argument for intelligent design you can share with skeptical friends and colleagues. To help you learn to do that, host Andrew McDiarmid begins a roundtable discussion with not one, not two, not three, but four guests to the podcast, all part of our team of resident scientists at Discovery Institute’s Center for Science and Culture: geologist and lawyer Casey Luskin, biochemist and metabolic nutritionist Emily Reeves, biologist Jonathan McLatchie, and physicist Brian Miller. The first half of the discussion kicks off with a review of the basics of design detection, including various methods for empirically detecting the hallmarks of design in nature. After that, these four experts take turns diving into examples of extraordinary design in the human body. This is Part 1 of a two-part conversation. Read More ›
nebula-and-galaxies-in-space-space-many-light-years-far-from-313552501-stockpack-adobestock
Nebula and galaxies in space. Space many light years far from the Earth. Elements of this image furnished by NASA.
Image Credit: Maximusdn - Adobe Stock
Type
post
Author
Brian Miller
Date
December 3, 2025
Tagged
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Why Intelligent Design Best Explains the Laws of Nature

Brian Miller
December 3, 2025
Uncategorized
3
On today’s ID The Future, host Brian Miller concludes a two-part conversation with physicist Aaron Zimmer and mathematician Ellie Feder, hosts of the Physics to God podcast, as they critique current explanations for the laws of nature and argue for an intelligent cause of the rules that govern the universe. This half of the conversation tackles the attempts made by scientists to explain these life-friendly laws as the result of chance, not design. This is Part 2 of a two-part conversation. Read More ›
view-of-the-earth-from-the-moon-stockpack-adobe-stock-295866546-stockpack-adobestock
View of the earth from the moon.
Image Credit: vovan - Adobe Stock
Type
post
Author
Brian Miller
Date
December 1, 2025
Tagged
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Beyond Fine-Tuning: Why the Laws of Nature Indicate Design

Brian Miller
December 1, 2025
Uncategorized
3
You might already have heard that the laws that govern our universe are finely tuned to allow for our existence. But beneath the special numbers of the universe lies an even deeper mystery: the laws of nature themselves. On today's ID The Future, join host Brian Miller as he begins a two-part conversation with physicist Aaron Zimmer and mathematician Ellie Feder, hosts of the Physics to God podcast, as they discuss their new work arguing for an intelligent cause based on the qualitative structure of reality's rules. The dream of finding a unique, logically necessary "theory of everything" has failed, which leaves an intriguing question: Why these specific laws? Zimmer and Feder explain why fundamental forces like gravity and complex systems like quantum mechanics are uniquely designed to produce a complex universe featuring atoms, molecules, stars, and life. The new argument focuses on the fundamental qualitative structure of the laws of nature, rather than the finely tuned quantities. Zimmer and Feder argue that these laws are not logically necessary, debunking the idea that a unique "theory of everything" could explain them. Instead, the laws are uniquely designed to produce a complex universe. This is Part 1 of a two-part conversation. Read More ›
Granville-Sewell-Arguments-for-ID-Episode-Image
Type
post
Author
Granville Sewell
Date
November 26, 2025
Tagged
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Get to Know This Mathematician’s Simple, Profound Arguments for Intelligent Design

Granville Sewell
November 26, 2025
Uncategorized
3
No amount of small, blind, and gradual changes to the steam engine could ever have produced the internal combustion engine. To get to that fundamentally new type of engine, an infusion of new information was required. That analogy can be applied to the origin of biological life too. The spectacular order, complexity, and design we see in life could not have been achieved gradually by a process that lacked foresight. On today's ID The Future, host Andrew McDiarmid welcomes mathematician Granville Sewell to the podcast to share some of his compelling arguments for intelligent design. We might think that mathematicians are focused on incredibly complex ideas and equations, way above the everyday thoughts of the rest of us. But as Sewell points out, mathematicians are trained to value simplicity, and complex problems can often be solved in simple ways. Sewell's straightforward, yet profound arguments for intelligent design are worth memorizing and sharing with your friends, family, and associates. Read More ›
broken-aged-part-of-the-historic-wall-in-berlin-stockpack-ad-248009634-stockpack-adobestock
broken aged part of the historic wall in berlin
Image Credit: Petros - Adobe Stock
Type
post
Author
Michael Behe
Date
November 24, 2025
Tagged
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Michael Behe: Why Darwinism Will Eventually Collapse

Michael Behe
November 24, 2025
Uncategorized
3
Failed ideas tend to eventually crumble under the weight of contrary evidence. Is modern evolutionary theory heading for the same fate? On this ID The Future, host Andrew McDiarmid speaks to biochemist Michael J. Behe about his core arguments for intelligent design and his recent experience sharing them at an Ivy League school. Behe, a professor of biochemistry at Lehigh University and author of Darwin's Black Box, recently presented some of his ID arguments to faculty, students, and post-docs at Cornell University. Behe reveals how his talk was received and shares some of his key insights highlighting the problems with Darwinian evolution. Read More ›
Magic-Wand-Natural-Selection-Image-AI-Generated
Magic Wand Symbolizing the Mystical Magical Qualities Often Ascribed to Natural Selection. Generated by AI.
Type
post
Author
Casey Luskin
Date
November 19, 2025
Tagged
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Casey Luskin: Theistic Evolution and the Limits of Neo-Darwinism

Casey Luskin
November 19, 2025
Uncategorized
3
Did God use evolution to create life? On this ID The Future, we’re sharing the second half of a recent conversation with Dr. Casey Luskin that originally aired on the Truthful Hope podcast. Casey is critiquing theistic evolution, the view that God used evolutionary mechanisms to create life. In today's episode, he continues by next addressing the inadequacy of natural selection and random mutation to generate biological complexity. Luskin also points out that even non-ID scientists have expressed skepticism about the explanatory power of neo-Darwinism. All this makes it very hard to justify the position of theistic evolutionists, who claim God uses evolution to create life. In reality, the more we learn about the complexity and design of life, the less adequate neo-Darwinism is as an explanation. This is Part 2 of a two-part conversation. Read More ›
molecule-of-mrna-3d-illustration-stockpack-adobe-stock-533172330-stockpack-adobestock
Molecule of mRNA, 3D illustration
Image Credit: Dr_Microbe - Adobe Stock
Type
post
Author
Casey Luskin
Date
November 17, 2025
Tagged
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Did God Use Evolution to Produce Life? Why Theistic Evolution Fails

Casey Luskin
November 17, 2025
Uncategorized
2
Some people attempt to reconcile belief in God with the standard evolutionary account of life's origins by combining the two. Theistic evolution is the view that God used evolutionary mechanisms to create life. But does this view stand up to scrutiny? Today, Dr. Casey Luskin critiques this perspective in the first half of a conversation that originally aired on the Truthful Hope podcast. The conversation kicks off with some clarity over terms, including what is meant by “evolution.” The theistic evolution perspective, also sometimes called evolutionary creation, accepts the standard scientific evolutionary account—the same view held by atheists—and simply adds the theological claim, "but this is how God did it". Critically, these proponents reject the idea that design can be empirically or scientifically detected in nature. As Luskin highlights, the central scientific problem with theistic evolution is that it inherits all the numerous scientific problems associated with the standard evolutionary account. This first half of the conversation rounds out with examples of those problems, specifically from the issue of the origin of life. This is Part 1 of a two-part conversation. Read More ›
components-of-eukaryotic-cell-nucleus-and-organelles-and-pla-323088501-stockpack-adobestock
Components of Eukaryotic cell, nucleus and organelles and plasma membrane - 3d illustration
Image Credit: Christoph Burgstedt - Adobe Stock
Type
post
Author
Michael Kent
Date
November 12, 2025
Tagged
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Life’s Informational Discontinuities: Where Unintelligent Processes Fail

Michael Kent
November 12, 2025
Uncategorized
3
Here's an experienced scientist who thinks YOU should have the power to settle the question of design in nature, not the scientific experts. Why? Because the majority of scientific authorities are committed scientific materialists, a view that hinders unbiased scientific inquiry by forbidding explanations outside the material realm. On this ID The Future, host Andrew McDiarmid concludes his conversation with recently retired bio-scientist Dr. Michael Kent. In Part 2, Dr. Kent continues to unpack the scientific discoveries of the last century that have changed the debate over design in nature and made materialism an increasingly irrational view of the history of life and the universe. This is Part 2 of a two-part conversation. Read More ›
Discovery Institute